During the tumultuous 60s and 70s, the country was going through extreme changes socially and politically. We were a divided country. It was not a time of moderation or listening. After John and I married in 1969, I joined the Oklahoma League of Women Voters. It was one of the best things I’ve ever done because it taught me to better listen and understand the many approaches and ideas a political issue could take. Notice it was about issues, not name-calling, cheap shots below the belts . . . And these were not shrinking violet women. The League formed out of the Suffrage for Women movement in 1920. In late 60s Oklahoma, it was composed of roughly an equal number of Republicans and Democrats.
The League of Women Voters is a non-partisan study group for finding ways to address local, state and national issues. The first thing you learned in League was democracy is for everyone and that having an informed electorate is a cornerstone of democracy. We spent a lot of time registering voters, but the major part of our work was studying issues and coming up with non-partisan positions on various issues. We sponsored Meet the Candidate forums. Our study groups came up with consensus on positions for addressing issues. So the second thing you learned was respect for other viewpoints as well as how to listen to understand and incorporate other ways of thinking into addressing issues.
It wasn’t about winning or maneuvering around other groups or endorsing candidates. It was finding an approach we could agree would improve government. Seems a rather quaint idea today.
I really learned the meaning of the phrase, “politics makes strange bedfellows.” You’d find yourself disagreeing with a particular individual only to work side-by-side with her to do something about the issue. As I said, it was wonderful training for learning how to find agreement and build consensus so that passion still existed to take on a tough and emotional issue with intelligence and resolve.
One example changed my life. Like many college towns, the University campus often becomes “land-locked” by the town growing around it. With that comes congestion. If your university has a popular sports team or other event, it gives new meaning to the word traffic gridlock. Long story short, Norman, Oklahoma, was considering a bond issue to cut down around 75 beautiful, mature oaks to widen a road to Owen Stadium.
The League was about to endorse the bond issue. A group of “tree huggers” who thought quality of life in neighborhoods was important, asked if there was another way. Remember, OU was having trouble growing because of being land-locked everyway but south. By suggesting a southern route, instead of the proposed western one, OU was better able to grow her campus south. Everybody won. But we had to think in a new way no one had considered.
Might we be able to take on some of our daunting problems in America, if we cooled the rhetoric and name calling and looked at what we agree about . . . and find more ways to incorporate new ways of thinking about an issue? Yes, we’d have to moderate our voices and passions and re-focus them on resolve to solve the problem. We might reduce clone answers at candidate forums, predictable partisan knee-jerks, and get some real choices.
Reprinted from the 3-28-2012 Fort Bend Independent
Recent Comments